1. What for? To make the code dirty? I really hate it. Most of the time, SPTK is used with stl ns, so it would be either sptk:: all over the code, or stl:: .. In any case - show me the gains.. 2. a. We need two methods then, const and not const. Will add as soon as CVS is working. b. Making it char requires a conversion in too many places while achieves nothing (IMHO) 2006/5/12, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>:
Hey,
Here are few things that would be nice to have.
1. Namespace. Let's wrap all classes in sptk:: namespace
2. Some minor cleanups:
a. make CBuffer.data() non-const (I think it's more or less illegal
to return non-const pointer to member, from const function)
b. Make it return void, not char*, since it is data buffer, not
character buffer.
I'll continue this list, as things come to mind.
--
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Total Knowledge. CTO
http://www.total-knowledge.com
-- Alexey Parshin, http://www.sptk.net
List hosted by Total Knowledge